This law note deals with the conceptual and fundamental introduction to the Limitation Act of 1963, starting from its need to its structure. We have also briefly covered the essential points that can be helpful for several judicial exams.

General Meaning of the Limitation Act, 1963

Before understanding the fundamentals of the Limitation Act, let us first discuss the most basic part of it, which is the meaning of the word ‘Limitation’.

Limitation means to limit something, or a restriction, or circumstances which are limited. In other words, limitation is the act of limiting something or circumstances which restrict something.

Limitation Act is the Act that prescribes the time limit or period of limitation for certain suits in civil matters so that the aggrieved party may apply within the limited time provided to them to file a suit or approach the court for justice.

Need for the Limitation Act

Suppose the plaintiff’s rights have been infringed in some way or his property is acquired by another person. In such cases, the plaintiff must always have a right to go to court to enforce his rights. But it does not mean that the plaintiff can enforce his right at any period of time, say 20 years or 30 years or more.

With the passage of time, the memory of human beings fades away, the necessary documents might get lost, the witnesses might be dead, and the basic facts of the matter might be forgotten. Therefore, there is a higher probability that such evidence might get lost. Hence, due to the lack of such necessary documents and evidence, there came a need to bring an Act known as the Limitation Act.

Origin of the Limitation Act

The origin of the Limitation Act is based on the meaning of these two basic legal maxims:

• Ubi jus ibi remedium, which means ‘where there is right, there is remedy.’
• Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniun, which means ‘law will assist those who are vigilant with their rights and not those who sleep there upon.’ In simpler words, ‘the law will not help those who sleep on their rights.’

This means that whenever the right of any person is violated, then he must be vigilant about the infringement and approach the court as soon as possible.

Purpose of the Limitation Act

The principle maxim Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium means, ‘the interest of the state requires that there should be the end of litigation.’ This means that the purpose of the Limitation Act is to end litigation and ensure justice.

Therefore, the Limitation Act is the Act which puts a bar (limit) on going to a court of law. It is based on the well-accepted principle of jurisprudence and public policy. Hence the object of the Limitation Act is to provide a legal remedy to repair the damage caused by legal injury, but such a legal remedy can only be enforced when it is claimed within the time provided in the Act.

Salient Features of the Limitation Act, 1963

These are the salient (most noticeable or important) features of the Limitation Act:

1. Exhaustive Law: The Limitation Act is an exhaustive law with respect to all the matters expressly provided in it. It is complete in itself.

2. Adjective Law: The Limitation Act is an adjective law. Being an adjective law, it provides for both the substantial and procedural features of any statute. But, it is more of procedural law. Note: Thus, in competitive exams, it should be marked as procedural law.

In A.S.K. Krishnappa Chettiar & Ors. Vs. S.V.V.Somiah & Ors, AIR 1964 SC 227, the Supreme Court noted that the Limitation Act is basically a piece of adjectives or procedural law and not substantive law. Here’s the detailed text:

The Limitation Act is a consolidating and amending statute relating to the limitation suits, appeals and certain types of applications to courts and must, therefore, be regarded as an exhaustive Code. It is piece of adjective or procedural law and not of substantive law. Rules of procedure, whatever they may be, are to be applied only to matters to which they are made applicable by the legislature expressly or by necessary implication. They cannot be extended by analogy or reference to proceedings to which they do not expressly apply or could be said to apply by necessary implication. It would, therefore, not be correct to apply any of the provisions of the Limitation Act to matters which do not strictly fall within the purview of those provisions. Thus, for instance, period of limitation for various kinds of suits, appeals and applications are prescribed in the First Schedule. A proceeding which does not fall under any of the articles in that schedule could not be said to be barred by time on the analogy of a matter which is governed by a particular article. For the same reasons the provisions of Sections 3 to 25 of the Limitation Act cannot be applied to situations which fall outside their purview.

These provisions do not adumbrate any general principles of substantive rights on litigants and therefore, cannot be permitted to have greater application than what is explicit or implicit in them.

3. Only applicable to civil cases: The Limitation Act applies only to civil matters

Extra knowledge: But in CrPC, the limitation period may range from 6 months to 3 years. The evidence can become redundant after a point of time and might get lost due to old claims, which fades away the reliability of such evidence, for example, blood-stained knife, victim’s cloth, etc.; therefore, there is a limitation period in criminal cases until and unless the contrary is mentioned in the law itself. But if the court finds merit in the case, then they can breach the limitation period and accept the case. Cases which have a punishment of more than three years do not have a limitation period.

4. Prospective as well as a retrospective effect: Section 31 of the Limitation Act provides for the retrospective and prospective effect of the Act.

5. Only applicable to suits, appeals and applications: Section 3 of the Limitation Act provides for the bar of limitation, which means that the Limitation Act only applies to suits, appeals, and applications.

Leading Case Laws Related to the Limitation Act

Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Company vs the State of Bombay (1957): In this case, the court held that the limitation bars the remedy and does not extinguish the right. Thus, the lapse of time does not extinguish the person’s right.

Sri Kishan Lal vs Musammat Kashmiro And Ors (1913): In this case, it was held that the law of limitation does not bar a defence but only bars action.

Structure of the Limitation Act, 1963

The structure of the Limitation Act is as follows:

• It came into force on 1st January 1964.
• Its citation is Act No. 36 of 1963.
• Extension: To the whole of India.
• Total number of chapters: 5
• Total sections: 32
• Total Articles: 137
• Schedule: 1

Read Next:
1. Important Sections of the Limitation Act
2. Limitation Act PDF

General Introduction to the Limitation Act, 1963
Ankita Soni

Understanding the general meaning of definitions is considered to be the most vital part of knowing the law and getting a grasp of the Bare Acts. Therefore to make this journey easier, this law note discusses all the definitions provided under the Limitation Act, 1963.

Important Definitions of Limitation Act

Section 2 of the Limitation Act of 1963 provides fourteen definitions. Let us discuss those definitions one by one.

1. Applicant

It is defined under section 2(a) of the Limitation Act. Applicant includes a:

(a) Petitioner
(Petition: A proposal given to the court that demands justice is a petition. And the person by whom it is given is a petitioner.)

(b) Any person from whom or through whom an applicant derives the right to apply as an applicant. Example: the guardian on behalf of a minor.

(c) Any person whose estate is represented by the applicant as executor (the person appointed by any person as representative of any estate after his death), administrator (a person appointed by the court as the representative of any state), or other representatives.

Therefore, it can be said that an applicant is a person who proposes something that has been made in writing.

2. Application

Section 2(b) of the Limitation Act defines the term application. In a general sense, an application is a proposal to the court that discloses the willingness of the applicant in any regard. As per section 2(b), it includes a petition as well.

3. Bill of exchange

A bill of exchange is a negotiable instrument (that is, a transferable document – say money) to pay a sum of money to a particular person on a particular date. According to section 2(c) of the Limitation Act, it includes a Hundi and a cheque.

4. Bond

Section 2(d) of the Limitation Act defines bond. It refers to an instrument where a person obliges himself to pay a certain sum of money to another person on the condition that if a certain specified act is performed or is not performed, the obligation shall become void.

5. Defendant

Section 2(e) of the Limitation Act defines the term defendant. Defendant is a person who defends the suit. It also includes any person from or through whom the defendant derives his liability to be sued. It also includes any person whose estate is represented by the defendant as an executor, administrator or other representatives.

6. Easement

Section 2(f) of the Limitation Act defines easement. It refers to the right to use the immovable property of another person for self-benefit in order to use one’s own property more comfortably or easily. It is a default right that arises without forming a contract, or it’s the right which does not arise from the contract. It includes the right to way. Right to way means a path across a private piece of land which may be used as a public way.

7. Foreign Country

Foreign country is defined under section 2(g) of the Limitation Act. It means any country other than India.

8. Good Faith

Good faith is defined under section 2(h) of the Limitation Act. It refers to the act done with due care and attention.

9. Plaintiff

Generally, the plaintiff refers to a person who brings the suit. According to section 2(i) of the Limitation Act, a plaintiff is a person who brings a suit or has a right to sue. It also includes a person from or through whom a plaintiff derives his right to sue, or any person whose estate is represented by the plaintiff as executor, administrator or other representatives.

10. Period of Limitation

Section 2(j) of the Limitation Act defines the terms period of limitation as well as prescribed period.

Period of limitation refers to the time period which is prescribed for any suit, appeal or application by the Schedule of the Limitation Act, 1963.

Prescribed period refers to the period of limitation computed according to the provisions of the Limitation Act.

11. Promissory Note

Section 2(k) of the Limitation Act defines a promissory note, where the maker of the instrument promises to pay a certain specified sum of money to another person in a limited period of time.

12. Suit

Section 2(l) of the Limitation Act defines a suit. It provides that suit does not include an appeal or an application.

13. Tort

Section 2(m) of the Limitation Act defines tort. Tort refers to a civil wrong, and it does not include a breach of contract or a breach of trust.

14. Trustee

Section 2(n) of the Limitation Act provides an exclusive definition of trustee, which says that trustee does not include a Benamidar, a mortgagee remaining in possession after a mortgage has been satisfied, or a person in a wrongful possession without a title.

Read Next:
1. Important Sections of Limitation Act
2. Limitation Act PDF Download

Important Definitions Under the Limitation Act, 1963
Ankita Soni

An Act to consolidate and amend the law for the limitation of suits and other proceedings and for purposes connected therewith. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fourteenth Year of the Republic of India as follows:-

Part I of Limitation Act – Preliminary

1. Short title, extent and commencement.

(1) This Act may be called the Limitation Act, 1963.

(2) It extends to the whole of India. (The words “except the State of Jammu and Kashmir” omitted by Act 34 of 2019, s. 95 and the Fifth Schedule (w.e.f. 31-10-2019).)

(3) It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint.

2. Definitions.

In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,
(a) “applicant” includes-
(i) a petitioner;
(ii) any person from or through whom an applicant derives his right to apply;
(iii) any person whose estate is represented by the applicant as executor, administrator or other representative;

(b) “application” includes a petition;

(c) “bill of exchange” includes a hundi and a cheque;

(d) “bond” includes any instrument whereby a person obliges himself to pay money to another, on condition that the obligation shall be void if a specified act is performed, or is not performed, as the case may be;

(e) “defendant” includes-
(i) any person from or through whom a defendant derives his liability to be sued;
(ii) any person whose estate is represented by the defendant as executor, administrator or other representative;

(f) “easement” includes a right not arising from contract, by which one person is entitled to remove and appropriate for his own profit any part of the soil belonging to another or anything growing in, or attached to, or subsisting upon, the land of another;

(g) “foreign country” means any country other than India;

(h) “good faith“- nothing shall be deemed to be done in good faith which is not done with due care and attention;

(i) “plaintiff” includes-
(i) any person from or through whom a plaintiff derives his right to sue;
(ii) any person whose estate is represented by the plaintiff as executor, administrator or other representative;

(j) “period of limitation” means the period of limitation prescribed for any suit, appeal or application by the Schedule, and “prescribed period” means the period of limitation computed in accordance with the provisions of this Act;

(k) “promissory note” means any instrument whereby the maker engages absolutely to pay a specified sum of money to another at a time therein limited, or on demand, or at sight;

(l) “suit” does not include an appeal or an application;

(m) “tort” means a civil wrong which is not exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of a trust;

(n) “trustee” does not include a benamidar, a mortgagee remaining in possession after the mortgage has been satisfied or a person in wrongful possession without title.

Part II of Limitation Act – Limitation of Suits, Appeals and Applications

3. Bar of limitation.

(1) Subject to the provisions contained in sections 4 to 24 (inclusive), every suit instituted, appeal preferred, and application made after the prescribed period shall be dismissed although limitation has not been set up as a defence.

(2) For the purposes of this Act-
(a) a suit is instituted-
(i) in an ordinary case, when the plaint is presented to the proper officer;
(ii) in the case of a pauper, when his application for leave to sue as a pauper is made; and
(iii) in the case of a claim against a company which is being wound up by the court, when the claimant first sends in his claim to the official liquidator;

(b) any claim by way of a set off or a counter claim, shall be treated as a separate suit and shall be deemed to have been instituted-
(i) in the case of a set off, on the same date as the suit in which the set off is pleaded;
(ii) in the case of a counter claim, on the date on which the counter claim is made in court;

(c) an application by notice of motion in a High Court is made when the application is presented to the proper officer of that court.

4. Expiry of prescribed period when court is closed.

Where the prescribed period for any suit, appeal or application expires on a day when the court is closed, the suit, appeal or application may be instituted, preferred or made on the date when the court reopens.

Explanation-
A court shall be deemed to be closed on any day within the meaning of this section if during any part of its normal working hours it remains closed on that day.

5. Extension of prescribed period in certain cases.

Any appeal or any application, other than an application under any of the provisions of Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, may be, admitted after the prescribed period, if the appellant or the applicant satisfies the court that he had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal or making the application within such period.

Explanation-
The fact that the appellant or the applicant was misled by any order, practice or judgement of the High Court in ascertaining or computing the prescribed period may be sufficient cause within the meaning of this section.

6. Legal disability.

(1) Where a person entitled to institute a suit or make an application for the execution of a decree, is at the time from which the prescribed period is to be reckoned, a minor or insane, or an idiot, he may institute the suit or make the application within the same period after the disability has ceased, as would otherwise have been allowed from the time specified therefor in the third column of the Schedule.

(2) Where such person is, at the time from which the prescribed period is to be reckoned, affected by two such disabilities, or where, before his disability has ceased, he is affected by another disability, he may institute the suit or make the application within the same period after both disabilities have ceased, as would otherwise have been allowed from the times so specified.

(3) Where the disability continues up to the death of that person, his legal representative may institute the suit or make the application within the same period after the death, as would otherwise have been allowed from the time so specified.

(4) Where the legal representative referred to in sub-section (3) is, at the date of the death of the person whom he represents, affected by any such disability, the rules contained in sub-sections (1) and (2) shall apply.

(5) Where a person under disability dies after the disability ceases but within the period allowed to him under this section, his legal representative may institute the suit or make the application within the same period after the death, as would otherwise have been available to that person had he not died.

Explanation-
For the purposes of this section ‘minor‘ includes a child in the womb.

7. Disability of one of several persons.

Where one of several persons jointly entitled to institute a suit or make an application for the execution of a decree is under any such disability, and a discharge can be given without the concurrence of such person, time will run against them all; but, where no such discharge can be given, time will not run as against any of them until one of them becomes capable of giving such discharge without the concurrence of the others or until the disability has ceased.

Explanation I-
This section applies to a discharge from every kind of liability, including a liability in respect of any immovable property.

Explanation II-
For the purposes of this section, the manager of a Hindu undivided family governed by the Mitakshara law shall be deemed to be capable of giving a discharge without the concurrence of the other members of the family only if he is in management of the joint family property.

Related Bare Act (in this act you will see the word Mitakshara): Hindu Succession Act, 1956

8. Special exceptions.

Nothing in section 6 or in section 7 applies to suits to enforce rights of pre-emption, or shall be deemed to extend, for more than three years from the cessation of the disability or the death of the person affected thereby, the period of limitation for any suit or application.

9. Continuous running of time.

Where once time has begun to run, no subsequent disability or inability to institute a suit or make an application stops it:
Provided that where letters of administration to the estate of creditor have been granted to his debtor, the running of the period of limitation for a suit to recover the debt shall be suspended while the administration continues.

10. Suits against trustees and their representatives.

Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this Act, no suit against a person in whom property has become vested in trust for any specific purpose, or against his legal representatives or assigns (not being assigns for valuable consideration), for the purpose of following in his or their hands such property, or the proceeds thereof, or for an account of such property or proceeds, shall be barred by any length of time.

Explanation-
For the purposes of this section any property comprised in a Hindu, Muslim or Buddhist religious or charitable endowment shall be deemed to be property vested in trust for a specific purpose and the manager of the property shall be deemed to be the trustee thereof.

11. Suits on contracts entered into outside the territories to which the Act extends.

(1) Suits instituted in the territories to which this Act extends on contracts entered into in the State (UT) of Jammu and Kashmir or in a foreign country shall be subject to the rules of limitation contained in this Act.

(2) No rule of limitation in force in the State (UT) of Jammu and Kashmir or in a foreign country shall be a defence to a suit instituted in the said territories on a contract entered into in that State or in a foreign country unless-
(a) the rule has extinguished the contract; and
(b) the parties were domiciled in that State or in the foreign country during the period prescribed by such rule.

Part III of Limitation Act – Computation of Period of Limitation

12. Exclusion of time in legal proceedings.

(1) In computing the period of limitation for any suit, appeal or application, the day from which such period is to be reckoned, shall be excluded.

(2) In computing the period of limitation for an appeal or an application for leave to appeal or for revision or for review of a judgement, the day on which judgement complained of was pronounced and the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the decree, sentence or order appealed from or sought to be revised or reviewed shall be excluded.

(3) Where a decree or order is appealed from or sought to be revised or reviewed, or where an application is made for leave to appeal from a decree or order, the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the judgement shall also be excluded.

(4) In computing the period of limitation for an application to set aside an award, the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the award shall be excluded.

Explanation-
In computing under this section the time requisite for obtaining a copy of a decree or an order, any time taken by the court to prepare the decree or order before an application for a copy thereof is made shall not be excluded.

13. Exclusion of time in cases where leave to sue or appeal as a pauper is applied for.

In computing the period of limitation prescribed for any suit or appeal in any case where an application for leave to sue or appeal as a pauper has been made and rejected, the time during which the applicant has been prosecuting in good faith his application for such leave shall be excluded, and the court may, on payment of the court fees prescribed for such suit or appeal, treat the suit or appeal as having the same force and effect as if the court fees had been paid in the first instance.

14. Exclusion of time of proceeding bona fide in court without jurisdiction.

(1) In computing the period of limitation for any suit the time during which the plaintiff has been prosecuting with due diligence another civil proceeding, whether in a court of first instance or of appeal or revision, against the defendant shall be excluded, where the proceeding relates to the same matter in issue and is prosecuted in good faith in a court which, from defect of jurisdiction or other cause of a like nature, is unable to entertain it.

(2) In computing the period of limitation for any application, the time during which the applicant has been prosecuting with due diligence another civil proceeding, whether in a court of first instance or of appeal or revision, against the same party for the same relief shall be excluded, where such proceeding is prosecuted in good faith in a court which, from defect of jurisdiction or other cause of a like nature, is unable to entertain it.

(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in rule 2 of Order XXIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the provisions of sub-section (1) shall apply in relation to a fresh suit instituted on permission granted by the court under rule 1 of that Order, where such permission is granted on the ground that the first suit must fail by reason of a defect in the jurisdiction of the court or other cause of a like nature.

Explanation-
For the purposes of this section-
(a) in excluding the time during which a former civil proceeding was pending, the day on which that proceeding was instituted and the day on which it ended shall both be counted;
(b) a plaintiff or an applicant resisting an appeal shall be deemed to be prosecuting a proceeding;
(c) misjoinder of parties or of causes of action shall be deemed to be a cause of a like nature with defect of jurisdiction.

15. Exclusion of time in certain other cases.

(1) In computing the period of limitation of any suit or application for the execution of a decree, the institution or execution of which has been stayed by injunction or order, the time of the continuance of the injunction or order, the day on which it was issued or made, and the day on which it was withdrawn, shall be excluded.

(2) In computing the period of limitation for any suit of which notice has been given, or for which the previous consent or sanction of the government or any other authority is required, in accordance with the requirements of any law for the time being in force, the period of such notice or, as the case may be, the time required for obtaining such consent or sanction shall be excluded.

Explanation-
In excluding the time required for obtaining the consent or sanction of the government or any other authority, the date on which the application was made for obtaining the consent or sanction and the date of receipt of the order of the government or other authority shall both be counted.

(3) In computing the period of limitation for any suit or application for execution of a decree by any receiver or interim receiver appointed in proceedings for the adjudication of a person as an insolvent or by any liquidator or provisional liquidator appointed in proceedings for the winding up of a company, the period beginning with the date of institution of such proceeding and ending with the expiry of three months from the date of appointment of such receiver or liquidator, as the case may be, shall be excluded.

(4) In computing the period of limitation for a suit for possession by a purchaser at a sale in execution of a decree, the time during which a proceeding to set aside the sale has been prosecuted shall be excluded.

(5) In computing the period of limitation for any suit the time during which the defendant has been absent from India and from the territories outside India under the administration of the Central Government, shall be excluded.

16. Effect of death on or before the accrual of the right to sue.

(1) Where a person who would, if he were living, have a right to institute a suit or make an application dies before the right accrues, or where a right to institute a suit or make an application accrues only on the death of a person, the period of limitation shall be computed from the time when there is a legal representative of the deceased capable of instituting such suit or making such application.

(2) Where a person against whom, if he were living, a right to institute a suit or make an application would have accrued dies before the right accrues, or where a right to institute a suit or make an application against any person accrues on the death of such person, the period of limitation shall be computed from the time when there is a legal representative of the deceased against whom the plaintiff may institute such suit or making such application.

(3) Nothing in sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) applies to suits to enforce rights of pre-emption or to suits for the possession of immovable property or of a hereditary office.

17. Effect of fraud or mistake.

(1) Where, in the case of any suit or application for which a period of limitation is prescribed by this Act-
(a) the suit or application is based upon the fraud of the defendant or respondent or his agent; or
(b) the knowledge of the right or title on which suit or application is founded is concealed by the fraud of any such person as aforesaid; or
(c) the suit or application is for relief from the consequences of a mistake; or
(d) where any document necessary to establish the right of the plaintiff or applicant has been fraudulently concealed from him;
the period of limitation shall not begin to run until the plaintiff or applicant has discovered the fraud or the mistake or could, with reasonable diligence, have discovered it; or in the case of a concealed document, until the plaintiff or the applicant first had the means of producing the concealed document or compelling its production:
Provided that nothing in this section shall enable any suit to be instituted or application to be made to recover or enforce any charge against, or set aside any transaction affecting, any property which-

(i) in the case of fraud, has been purchased for valuable consideration by a person who was not a party to the fraud and did not at the time of the purchase know, or have reason to believe, that any fraud had been committed, or
(ii) in the case of mistake, has been purchased for valuable consideration subsequently to the transaction in which the mistake was made, by a person who did not know, or have reason to believe, that the mistake had been made, or
(iii) in the case of concealed document, has been purchased for valuable consideration by a person who was not a party to the concealment and, did not at the time of purchase know, or have reason to believe, that the document had been concealed.

(2) Where a judgement-debtor has, by fraud or force, prevented the execution of a decree or order with the period of limitation, the court may, on the application of the judgement-creditor made after the expiry of the said period extend the period for execution of the decree or order:
Provided that such application is made within one year from the date of the discovery of the fraud or the cessation of force, as the case may be.

18. Effect of acknowledgement in writing.

(1) Where, before the expiration of the prescribed period for a suit or application in respect of any property or right, an acknowledgement of liability in respect of such property or right has been made in writing signed by the party against whom such property or right is claimed, or by any person through whom he derives his title or liability, a fresh period of limitation shall be computed from the time when the acknowledgement was so signed.

(2) Where the writing containing the acknowledgement is undated, oral evidence may be given of the time when it was signed; but subject to the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, oral evidence of its contents shall not be received.

Explanation-
For the purposes of this section-
(a) an acknowledgement may be sufficient though it omits to specify the exact nature of the property or right, or avers that the time for payment, delivery, performance or enjoyment has not yet come or is accompanied by a refusal to pay, deliver, perform or permit to enjoy, or is coupled with a claim to set-off, or is addressed to a person other than a person entitled to the property or right;

(b) the word “signed” means signed either personally or by an agent duly authorised in this behalf; and

(c) an application for the execution of a decree or order shall not be deemed to be an application in respect of any property or right.

19. Effect of payment on account of debt or of interest on legacy.

Where payment on account of a debt or of interest on a legacy is made before the expiration of the prescribed period by the person liable to pay the debt or legacy or by his agent duly authorised in this behalf, a fresh period of limitation shall be computed from the time when the payment was made:
Provided that, save in the case of payment of interest made before the 1st day of January, 1928, an acknowledgement of the payment appears in the handwriting of, or in a writing signed by, the person making the payment.

Explanation-
For the purposes of this section-
(a) where mortgaged land is in the possession of the mortgagee, the receipt of the rent or produce of such land shall be deemed to be a payment;

(b) “debt” does not include money payable under a decree or order of a court.

20. Effect of acknowledgement or payment by another person.

(1) The expression “agent duly authorised in this behalf” in sections 18 and 19 shall, in the case of a person under disability, include his lawful guardian, committee or manager or an agent duly authorised by such guardian, committee or manager to sign the acknowledgement or make the payment.

(2) Nothing in the said sections renders one of several joint contractors, partners, executors or mortgagees chargeable by reason only of a written acknowledgement signed by, or of a payment made by, or by the agent of, any other or others of them.

(3) For the purposes of the said sections,-
(a) an acknowledgement signed or a payment made in respect of any liability by or by the duly authorised agent of, any limited owner of property who is governed by Hindu law, shall be a valid acknowledgement or payment, as the case may be, against a reversioner succeeding to such liability; and

(b) where a liability has been incurred by or on behalf of a Hindu undivided family as such, an acknowledgement or payment made by, or by the duly authorised agent of, the manager of the family for the time being shall be deemed to have been made on behalf of the whole family.

21. Effect of substituting or adding new plaintiff or defendant.

(1) Where after the institution of a suit, a new plaintiff or, defendant is substituted or added, the suit shall, as regards him, be deemed to have been instituted when he was so made a party:
Provided that where the court is satisfied that the omission to include a new plaintiff or defendant was due to a mistake made in good faith it may direct that the suit as regards such plaintiff or defendant shall be deemed to have been instituted on any earlier date.

(2) Nothing in sub-section (1) shall apply to a case where a party is added or substituted owing to assignment or devolution of any interest during the pendency of a suit or where a plaintiff is made a defendant or a defendant is made a plaintiff.

22. Continuing breaches and torts.

In the case of a continuing breach of contract or in the case of a continuing tort, a fresh period of limitation begins to run at every moment of the time during which the breach or the tort, as the case may be, continues.

23. Suits for compensation for acts not actionable without special damage.

In the case of a suit for compensation for an act which does not give rise to a cause of action unless some specific injury actually results therefrom, the period of limitation shall be computed from the time when the injury results.

24. Computation of time mentioned in instruments.

All instruments shall for the purposes of this Act be deemed to be made with reference to the Gregorian calendar.

Part IV of Limitation Act – Acquisition of Ownership by Possession

25. Acquisition of easement by prescription.

(1) Where the access and use of light or air to and for any building have been peaceably enjoyed therewith as an easement, and as of right, without interruption, and for twenty years, and where any way or watercourse or the use of any water or any other easement (whether affirmative or negative) has been peaceably and openly enjoyed by any person claiming title thereto as an easement and as of right without interruption and for twenty years, the right to such access and use of light or air, way, watercourse, use of water, or other easement shall be absolute and indefeasible.

(2) Each of the said periods of twenty years shall be taken to be a period ending within two years next before the institution of the suit wherein the claim to which such period relates is contested.

(3) Where the property over which a right is claimed under sub-section (1) belongs to the government that sub-section shall be read as if for the words “twenty years” the words “thirty years” were substituted.

Explanation-
Nothing is an interruption with the meaning of this section, unless where there is an actual discontinuance of the possession or enjoyment by reason of an obstruction by the act of some person other than the claimant, and unless such obstruction submitted to or acquiesced in for one year after the claimant has notice thereof and of the person making or authorising the same to be made.

26. Exclusion in favour of reversioner of servient tenement.

Where any land or water upon, over or from, which any easement has been enjoyed or derived has been held under or by virtue of any interest for life or in terms of years exceeding three years from the granting thereof the time of the enjoyment of such easement during the continuance of such interest or term shall be excluded in the computation of the period of twenty years in case the claim is, within three years next after the determination of such interests or term resisted by the person entitled on such determination to the said land or water.

A servient estate (or servient premises or servient tenement) is a parcel of land that is subject to an easement. The easement may be an easement in gross, an easement that benefits an individual or other entity, or it may be an easement appurtenant, an easement that benefits another parcel of land. For an easement appurtenant, the parcel of land that benefits from an easement over the servient estate is called the dominant estate (or dominant premises or dominant tenement. – Wikipedia

27. Extinguishment of right to property.

At the determination of the period hereby limited to any person for instituting a suit for possession of any property, his right to such property shall be extinguished.

Part V of Limitation Act – Miscellaneous

28. Amendment of certain Acts.

[Rep. by the Repealing and Amending Act, 1974 (56 of 1974) s. 2 and First Schedule.]

29. Saving.

(1) Nothing in this Act shall affect Section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

(2) Where any special or local law prescribes for any suit, appeal or application a period of limitation different from the period prescribed by the Schedule, the provisions of section 3 shall apply as if such periods were the periods prescribed by the Schedule and for the purpose of determining any period of limitation prescribed for any suit, appeal or application by any special or local law, the provisions contained in sections 4 to 24 (inclusive) shall apply only in so far as, and to the extent to which, they are not expressly excluded by such special or local law.

(3) Save as otherwise provided in any law for the time being in force with respect to marriage and divorce, nothing in this Act shall apply to any suit or other proceeding under any such law.

(4) Sections 25 and 26 and the definition of “easement” in section 2 shall not apply to cases arising in the territories to which the Indian Easements Act, 1882 (5 of 1882), may for the time being extend.

30. Provision for suits, etc, for the prescribed period is shorter than the period prescribed by the Indian Limitation Act, 1908.

Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act-
(a) any suit for which the period of limitation is shorter than the period of limitation prescribed by the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, may be instituted within a period of seven years next after the commencement of this Act or within the period prescribed for such suit by the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, whichever period expires earlier:
Provided that if in respect of any such suit, the said period of seven years expires earlier than the period of limitation prescribed therefor under the Indian Limitation Act, 1908 and the said period of seven years together with so much of the period of limitation in respect of such suit under the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, as has already expired before the commencement of this Act is shorter than the period prescribed for such suit under this Act, then, the suit may be instituted within the period of limitation prescribed therefor under this Act;

(b) any appeal or application for which the period of limitation is shorter than the period of limitation prescribed by the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, may be preferred or made within a period of ninety days next after the commencement of this Act or within a period prescribed for such appeal or application by the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, whichever period expires earlier.

31. Provisions as to barred or pending suits, etc.

Nothing in this Act shall-
(a) enable any suit, appeal or application to be instituted, preferred or made, for which the period of limitation prescribed by the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, expired before the commencement of this Act; or
(b) affect any suit, appeal or application instituted, preferred or made before, and pending at, such commencement.

32. Repeal.

[Rep. by the Repealing and Amending Act, 1974 (56 of 1974)]

Schedule of the Limitation Act

Read Next:
1. Important Sections of Limitation Act
2. Important Definitions Under the Limitation Act, 1963
3. General Introduction to the Limitation Act, 1963
4. Limitation Act PDF Download

Limitation Act, 1963
WritingLaw

Limitation Act is important for understanding procedural law. The right can be claimed within the period of limitation only. Once the time elapses, the right becomes imperfect and not enforceable. Every section and article of Limitation Act, 1963 is important and can’t be left assuming unimportant. One should read the whole bare act carefully. It is short, simple, and easy to understand. Still, for the purpose of this post and law exams, here are the most important sections of the Limitation Act.

Important Sections of Limitation Act, 1963

Section 2 – Definitions.
Section 3 – Bar of limitation.
Section 4 – Expiry of prescribed period when court is closed.
Section 5 – Extension of prescribed period in certain cases.
Section 6 – Legal disability.
Section 10 – Suits against trustees and their representatives.
Section 12 – Exclusion of time in legal proceedings.
Section 13 – Exclusion of time in cases where leave to sue or appeal as a pauper is applied for.
Section 15 – Exclusion of time in certain other cases.
Section 16 – Effect of death on or before the accrual of the right to sue.
Section 18 – Effect of acknowledgement in writing.
Section 20 – Effect of acknowledgement or payment by another person.
Section 21 – Effect of substituting or adding new plaintiff or defendant.
Section 24 – Computation of time mentioned in instruments.
Section 25 – Acquisition of easement by prescription.
Section 27 – Extinguishment of right to property.

Important Articles of the Limitation Act

Article 5, Article 19, Article 27, Article 51 and Article 52, Article 54, Article 56, Article 59, Article 60 to Article 65, Article 68, Article 78, Article 90, Article 97, Article 105, Article 109, Article 113 to Article 116, Article 120, Article 123 and Article 124, Article 130, Article 134 and Article 135, Article 137.

Limitation Act for Exams

Limitation Act has 32 sections, and thus, it would be best if you focus on all of these. Still, I hope the list of above most important sections helped you gain some valuable perspective from the exams’ point of view.

If you want, you can get a nice PDF of this act and many more at an affordable price. WritingLaw also offers MCQ Tests that have mixed questions from various important law subjects. These are important for all law exams like Judiciary, CLAT, semester exams, and more.

Read Next:
1. Important Definitions Under the Limitation Act, 1963
2. General Introduction to the Limitation Act, 1963

Important Sections of Limitation Act
WritingLaw

LIMITATION ACT PDF DOWNLOAD

The PDF you are about to get, is created by me.

This PDF is not the usual, black & white PDF found on other sites. This PDF is thoughtfully and beautifully created. It takes me a lot of time and energy to create these PDFs.

You can get these PDFs in two ways.

1. Pay any tiny amount that you can. This helps me keep WritingLaw alive and ad-free. You also support my hard work. Thank You.

2. Get it for free.

HOW ARE THESE PDFs BEAUTIFUL?

Here are some points that make PDFs by WritingLaw different from PDFs that you see on other websites; (see PDF picture below)

1. COLOURS – Different colours have been used for Explanations, Exceptions, Case Names, Illustrations etc. Who doesn’t like colours in their life!

2. PERFECT FOR MOBILE – The font type and font size that I have used is perfect for mobile phones. On 5 inch mobile phone you will not have to zoom to read. You can continue reading comfortably.

3. SECTION LINKS – You know that bare act for one subject has mentions about sections of other bare acts. I have provided direct links for all these sections to save your time and energy.

For Example-
Section 174A of IPC, has a mention of Section 82 of CrPC.
Now many students while reading section 174A of IPC will not know what Section 82 of CrPC is. It will take time to find that section in a different bare act.
 Typing and searching will disturb the flow.
What I have done is that, I have given links for these sections right there. Clicking on it will instantly take you to those sections in your browser.

4. BEAUTIFUL – The side numbers are made bold. Like (1), (2), (a), (b) etc. This looks good on eyes and helps differentiate different points.

5. EASY – Long bare acts are divided systematically in chapters and sections. A student gets bored seeing a very long bare act. But he/she will be excited to finish small parts with few sections and chapters and then go to next.

Here is how the PDF will look. Don’t worry, the images you see below are compressed screenshot images and further compressed by the website. So they appear of low quality. Actual PDF is clear, crisp and beautiful.

DOWNLOAD PDF for LIMITATION ACT

Download the PDF for free.

But please,
When you are capable, come back on this website or use links in the PDF and pay me any small amount that you can. Thank You very much.

(370 KB)

If you are on slow internet connection and do not see the green download button then please click here to download.

Read Next:
1. Important Definitions Under the Limitation Act, 1963
2. General Introduction to the Limitation Act, 1963

Limitation Act PDF Download
WritingLaw