Developing effective argumentative skills is crucial for lawyers and advocates in the legal profession. This article explores the topic of mooting and its significance in developing argumentative skills for new law students. It discusses the need for mooting, highlighting its importance in enhancing the ability to construct and present persuasive arguments.
The Vital Importance of Comprehensive Education and Training for Lawyers
The profession of lawyers, along with doctors, has the power to decide on the life and death of another (though in different contexts). With such extraordinary responsibilities being laid on their shoulders, it seems only appropriate that the profession should be accorded commensurate education and training. Moreover, many life-saving and advocacy skills that lawyers require will develop with experience. Therefore, it is essential for the efficient functioning of the legal system that its primary players be well-equipped in law and lawyering skills.
Mooting in its earliest form dates from about the year 1485 when moots were organised by the Inns of Court in England. These early moots differed from the format familiar today, where moots are generally concerned only with points of law. The early moots by the Inns of Court were best viewed as a pleading exercise.
A moot is a legal debate in an artificial courtroom setting. It is based on a hypothetical case. Moots are set to test the ability of the mooter to present a legal argument. The standard mooter is judged by paying particular attention to the mooter’s ability to use the available legal authorities, answer questions, observe the etiquette of the courtroom, and generally appear competent as an advocate.
A typical moot problem is solely concerned with a point (or points) of law. Usually, it will take the form of a case heard on appeal with the grounds of appeal clearly stated. Unlike the ancient moots, a modern moot speech will have a strict time limit of 15-20 minutes. In addition, the speakers are given a specific time limit to present their arguments.
Finally, at least one judge (but there can be more than one judge) presides over the moot and delivers a judgment at the end of the moot, both on the law and on the result of the moot itself.
Organising a Moot
Organising a moot requires a good deal of preparation for both mooters and the moot organiser. It is necessary for the mooters to prepare their arguments in advance of the moot and to select the most appropriate legal authorities for the argument.
The organisers of moot courts and the mooters must know that effective time management is the hallmark of a good advocate. Therefore, within the available time, the mooters are expected to put forth their arguments methodically, logically, and precisely without wasting the court’s precious time.
Key Skills Required for Mooting
Mooting is a popular form of mock court trial in which law students and lawyers practice their advocacy skills by arguing a hypothetical case before a panel of judges. Mooting is a great way for students to develop argumentative skills essential for success in the legal profession. Here are some key skills required for mooting and how they can be developed:
1. Legal Research and Analysis
To make a persuasive argument, you need to understand the law well and how it applies to the facts of the case. Therefore, it requires extensive legal research and analysis. You can develop these skills by reading legal cases, studying legal texts, and practising legal research methods.
2. Communication and Presentation Skills
Effective communication is essential for any advocate. You must be able to present your arguments confidently and persuasively. You can develop these skills by practising public speaking, taking courses in public speaking and presentation skills, and getting feedback from others.
3. Logical Reasoning and Critical Thinking
A good advocate must be able to identify the key issues in a case, analyse the relevant legal principles, and construct a logical argument. You can develop these skills by practising analytical reasoning exercises, such as analysing arguments, identifying fallacies, and applying logical and critical thinking.
4. Persuasion and Negotiation Skills
A successful advocate must persuade others to accept their arguments and negotiate effectively. You can develop these skills by studying negotiation techniques, practising persuasive communication, and observing experienced advocates in action.
5. Time Management and Organisation
Mooting requires careful time management and organisation, as you must research and prepare your arguments, coordinate with your team, and present your case within a set timeframe. You can develop these skills by practising time management techniques, such as creating schedules, prioritising tasks, and developing effective organisational systems.
Thus, mooting is an excellent way for law students and lawyers to develop their argumentative skills. By focusing on legal research, communication, logical reasoning, persuasion, negotiation, time management, and organisation, advocates can hone their skills and become effective advocates for their clients.
Advantages of Mooting
Mooting provides students with a unique and unparalleled experience in legal education. Preparation for a moot helps develop basic research and presentation skills. A moot speech requires the mooter to acquire the ability to rapidly identify the legal issue or issues posed by the moot question. It is not merely because mooting promotes a facility and confidence in public speaking, imparts persuasion skills, and enhances the ability to see both sides of the argument.
Further, in conducting the research for a moot, many students will also become familiar with specific legal materials and information retrieval systems, which might otherwise have escaped them throughout their time in higher education.
With some experience, skilful mooters can argue both sides of the case, which involves identifying with ease the arguments in their favour and those less favourable to their side of the case.
A mooter must be ready to challenge opposing authorities and carefully analyze the nuances of the case to find favourable arguments. This process helps students explore unfamiliar aspects, such as dissenting judgments. It also benefits the students during their academic studies.
Finally, some exercises can provide practical experience and encourage growth in the confidence of the law student in the way that participation in mooting can. In short, the mooting bridges the gap in a legal education system that emphasises written arguments more.
Key Requirements and Strategies for Developing Effective Argumentative Skills
The art of advocacy is never complete without the ability to argue the case effectively. A lawyer who generally falters always fails. No one can argue a case successfully unless he knows all the facts and points of law involved in it. A successful lawyer or advocate must be a voracious reader.
During a case before the court, a lawyer may have to argue on various occasions on different points as the circumstances require, for example, an opening speech, an argument on several interlocutory matters, and the like, up to the closing speech.
The argument of every claim, defence, allegation, averment, or assertion concerning any particular matter is its summation and the highest point or climax in the art of advocacy. By a convincing argument, a cause that was thought of as seemingly lost may be rescued. Hence, an advocate must develop the ability to argue cases effectively.
Since the subject matter of litigations may be of different varieties, he must acquire sound knowledge of every branch of learning. In every particular case, his knowledge must be deep as to its entire facts, law, circumstances, and evidence.
From the very start, he must try to arrest the judge’s attention and inspire interest. An advocate must have a clear perception of the conviction, sentiments and prejudices of the judge. He should follow the court procedure and observe the high standards of professional etiquette pleasingly.
The following facts make successful arguments:
- Art of spontaneous debate
- Honesty in arguments
- Preparation for arguments
- Art of persuasion
- Efficacy of words
- Critical thinking
- Research skills
It is the gift of speech that, more than any other skill, equips the advocate to achieve his primary purpose: persuasion. It is the faculty of presenting a point of view, whether argumentative or emotional, in such language as to impress the minds of the audience, whatever that audience may be. The language must be clear, controlled, and saturated with facts and ideas.
2. Art of Spontaneous Debate
On many occasions, one must argue and reason offhand without previous preparation. The art of spontaneous debate depends upon the resources of the moment and the readiness of tongue and wit. The arguments should be delivered extemporaneously (spoken without preparation). It should be with great deliberation and force. No doubt, references to the brief may be necessary, but the quotations from that place should be as few and brief as possible.
Strong points should come first, and the weak points and the arguments must be concluded with the most vital points. More invalid arguments should never precede stronger ones. It is better to concede if the advocate finds that the opponents’ issue is decisive and cannot be met.
The weak point in the opponent’s case should be emphasised much to prove that the weakness is of such a nature that, despite everything else, cannot be sustained. If the advocate is satisfied that he has convinced the judge, he may stop the argument and not go on repeating it.
3. Honesty in Arguments
All around, honesty and integrity are virtues that have a very high place in the legal profession. An advocate should present the law correctly and honestly and avoid deception in court. It should be remembered that the lawyer who tries to mislead the court by showing decisions that have long been overruled is found out quickly. The court never believes him, and as soon as it turns out that the judges have no faith in him, he starts losing his clients. Suppression of the actual situation of a case from the court, coaching witnesses, etc., is some instances of dishonest dealings. Hence, honesty in advocacy, as in any other field, always pays.
4. Preparation for Arguments
Arguments require intense preparation. It requires research, study, and application. Mathew Arnold said that most of us are what we must be, not what we should be, not even what we ought to be.
If we cultivate the habit of studying from the beginning, the habit will be second nature. Until then, success is only a cloud on the horizon.
The entire argument proceeds with what has been prepared for it. Therefore, a thorough study of the case and deep thinking should be developed as a habit of mind to reduce the case into certain formal propositions to place the same before the judge in the form of an argument.
Preparation of argument includes the study of all the relevant rulings on the points involved in the case. A list of all the instances and texts of authority the lawyer intends to cite in support of his argument must be separately prepared. Authorities must be coded with accurate reference to the Law Reports, books of sources, the case title, the court by which it is decided, year, volume, and page.
5. Art of Persuasion
An advocate must bear in mind that the judge is always searching for the determining facts, law evidence, and circumstances of the case to arrive at the correct decision. Therefore, the most crucial task of the advocate is to convince the judge of the determining factors and to lead his mind to the ultimately desired conclusions. It is the art of persuasion. To be a good lawyer, one must have a personality, a command over the language, confidence in own self, a capacity for clear and logical thinking, and a logical manner.
6. Efficacy of words
The advocate should know what to say and how and when to say it. He should finish and embellish his reasons, drape, and paint the subject description. His words should strike like a hammer, pierce like a stiletto or soothe like a mother’s lullaby.
Lord Denning observed,
“To succeed in the profession of law, you must seek to cultivate command of language. Words are the lawyer’s tools of the trade. When you are called upon to address a judge, your words count the most. It is by them that you will hope to persuade the judge of the rightness of your cause. When interpreting a section in a statute or a paragraph in a regulation, you must study the very words. You have to discover the meaning by analysing the words- one by one- to the last syllable. When drawing up a will or a contract, you must choose your words well. The reason why words are so important is that words are the vehicle of thought. Apart from writing, there is addressing the court. Speaking needs even more practice; and even more experience.”
A well-crafted argument often involves thinking outside the box and developing innovative solutions. Creativity can be developed by engaging in activities stimulating the imagination, such as brainstorming, mind mapping, and visualisation exercises.
8. Critical Thinking
Analysing and evaluating arguments and evidence is essential for constructing a convincing argument. Critical thinking can be developed through activities such as analysing news articles, participating in debates, and taking courses in logic and reasoning.
9. Research Skills
A strong argument requires evidence to back it up. Developing research skills involves learning to identify reliable sources, evaluate their credibility, and synthesize information from multiple sources.
Effective argumentation requires a well-organised and structured presentation of ideas. Organisational skills can be developed by outlining arguments and structuring written and verbal presentations.
Effective communication is essential for delivering a persuasive argument. Communication skills can be developed by practising public speaking, participating in debates, and taking effective communication and presentation courses.
- Bholaram vs Smt. Parwati Sahu – Case Explained in Easy Words - 1st October 2023
- B. Sunitha vs State of Telangana – Case Explained - 14th August 2023
- Application of Social Research Findings in the Field of Law - 5th August 2023