WritingLaw (Page 52)

84. Presumption as to powers-of-attorney. The Court shall presume that every document purporting to be a power-of-attorney, and to have been executed before, and authenticatedRead More →

85. Presumption as to electronic agreements. The Court shall presume that every electronic record purporting to be an agreement containing the electronic or digital signatureRead More →

86. Presumption as to electronic records and electronic signatures. (1) In any proceeding involving a secure electronic record, the Court shall presume unless contrary isRead More →

87. Presumption as to Electronic Signature Certificates. The Court shall presume, unless contrary is proved, that the information listed in an Electronic Signature Certificate isRead More →

88. Presumption as to certified copies of foreign judicial records. (1) The Court may presume that any document purporting to be a certified copy ofRead More →

89. Presumption as to books, maps and charts. The Court may presume that any book to which it may refer for information on matters ofRead More →

90. Presumption as to electronic messages. The Court may presume that an electronic message, forwarded by the originator through an electronic mail server to theRead More →

91. Presumption as to due execution, etc., of documents not produced. The Court shall presume that every document, called for and not produced after noticeRead More →

92. Presumption as to documents thirty years old. Where any document, purporting or proved to be thirty years old, is produced from any custody whichRead More →

93. Presumption as to electronic records five years old. Where any electronic record, purporting or proved to be five years old, is produced from anyRead More →

CHAPTER VI – OF THE EXCLUSION OF ORAL EVIDENCE BY DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE 94. Evidence of terms of contracts, grants and other dispositions of property reducedRead More →

95. Exclusion of evidence of oral agreement. When the terms of any such contract, grant or other disposition of property, or any matter required byRead More →

96. Exclusion of evidence to explain or amend ambiguous document. When the language used in a document is, on its face, ambiguous or defective, evidenceRead More →

97. Exclusion of evidence against application of document to existing facts. When language used in a document is plain in itself, and when it appliesRead More →

98. Evidence as to document unmeaning in reference to existing facts. When language used in a document is plain in itself, but is unmeaning inRead More →

99. Evidence as to application of language which can apply to one only of several persons. When the facts are such that the language usedRead More →