National Human Right Commission
There is no specific definition of human rights given anywhere. It is said that the rights which a person derives from his birth are human rights.

Being human, there are certain rights like the right to life, right to dignity, right to livelihood, and many others. Human rights are moral rights. They are universal rights.

It is observed that the rights don’t serve the purpose unless they are protected. For the protection of human rights, there have been conventions, summits, and formation of commissions.

Bare Acts

This is the reason for the creation of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and the State Human Rights Commission (SHRC).

Paris Convention On National Human Rights Commission

The Paris Convention came up with few suggestions:

1. It is every nation’s duty to establish a human rights commission.
2. There should be an autonomous body working for the protection of human rights.
3. To scrutinize the working of these bodies, there must be watchdog agencies to ensure better operation.
4. India has also signed all international treaties related to human rights like amnesty international and green peace.

Composition Of National Human Rights Commission

1. One Chairperson who is generally a retired Chief Justice of India (or a Supreme Court Judge). As of 2nd June 2021, the Chairperson of NHRC is Arun Kumar Mishra. See the list of former Chairpersons.

Subject Wise Law MCQ Tests

2. Four ex-officio members appointed by the President with the consultation of the advisory committee:
I. Chairman of National Commission for Scheduled Castes.
II. Chairman of National Commission for Scheduled Tribes.
III. Chairman of National Commission for Minorities.
IV. Chairman of National Commission for Women.

3. President to appoint four other members with the consultation of the advisory committee:
I. A person who is or has been a judge of the Supreme Court.
II. A person who is or has been chief justice of a High Court.
III. Two members having specialized knowledge and practical experience in human rights.

Removal Of Member Of National Human Rights Commission

A member of the National Human Rights Commission can be removed on two grounds by order of the President:

1. Misbehaviour
2. Incapacity to perform

Why National Human Rights Commission Came Into Existence

There are various reasons for which NHRC was made or introduced. Its existence is of utmost significance. The reasons are as follows:

1. The remedy sought through courts or by the medium of litigation is costly and expensive.
2. The procedure of trial in court is time consuming.
3. To overcome the emergent situations and circumstances.
4. There are certain restrictions in PIL as well. PIL can’t be the source of justice for human rights.
5. The court process is formalised and technical.

Functions Of National Human Rights Commission

National human rights commission performs various functions at the national level for the protection and upliftment of human rights. They are as follows:

1. NHRC creates a balance of harmony between parliament and citizens by protecting human rights.
2. NHRC is a national body, apex to the State Human Rights Commission, and works as an appellate body also.
3. NHRC investigates the matters and scrutinizes complaints related to violations of human rights.
4. In various cases, NHRC asks the central government to investigate the matters which concern national integrity.
5. It keeps surveillance on all bodies who are working for the protection of human rights.

Note: NHRC is not a constitutional body.

WritingLaw » Law Notes » National Human Rights Commission – Composition and Function Law Study Material WritingLaw's Telegram and Excellent Instagram

10 Comments

  1. Nicely & Concisely explained very well.
    Thank you Writing Law

  2. Very precisely explained covering all the corners…. Thanks for enriching us

  3. It’s a very good platform to clear your all doubts..their day to day topics are so easy to understand and it carries a positivity in your mind that you can attempt any exam and will be able to clear it. Thank you WritingLaw. keep continuing this.

    1. I loved going through your nice words. Happy to read them. Thank you.

  4. Under the Paris convention head, the 4th point seem inappropriate, firstly because it cannot be a suggestion, and secondly, Amnesty International and Green Peace are not treaties. Kindly correct me if wrong.

    1. International law is a weak law. For every nation, international law works differently because every nation has its own challenges. For example, many conventions and treaties in their reports suggested that there should be minimization of emission of CO² but the countries which are still developing need to be given some relaxation. If any international convention takes place, their report contains suggestions and countries who are member and signed to the treaty or convention must adhere to the suggestions. Fourth point is subsidiary to India’s initiative in different conventions for safeguarding rights of human. For more, refer to this article.

  5. Good article…..thnx for the knowledge

Comments are closed.