468. Bar to taking cognizance after lapse of the period of limitation.

(1) Except as otherwise provided elsewhere in this Code, no Court, shall take cognizance of an offence of the category specified in sub-section (2), after the expiry of the period of limitation.

(2) The period of limitation shall be-
(a) six months, if the offence is punishable with fine only;
(b) one year, if the offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year;
(c) three years, if the offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term exceeding one year but not exceeding three years.

(3) For the purposes of this section, the period of limitation, in relation to offences which may be tried together, shall be determined with reference to the offence which is punishable with the more severe punishment or, as the case may be, the most severe punishment.

Comments:
(i) Once the limitation has begun to run, it runs its full course;
Venkappa Gurappa Hosur v. Kasawwa, (1997) 4 Supreme 217. 

(ii) Sub-section (3) of section 468 which was added by CrPC (Amendment Act), 1978 provides that in relation to offences which may be tried together, the period of limitation shall be tried together, the period of limitation shall be determined with reference to the offence which is punishable with the more or most severe punishment. The language of sub-section (3) of section 468 makes it imperative that the limitation provided for taking cognizance in section 468 is in respect of offence charged and not in respect of offence finally proved;
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Tara Dutta, AIR 2000 SC 297. 

(iii) When the respondents were charged under section 468 read with 120B IPC per which the impossible punishment is 7 years and section 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act 1947, which is punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 7 years and for such offences no period as limitation having been provided for in section 468, the cognizance taken by Special Judge cannot said to be barred by limitation;
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Tara Dutta, AIR 2000 SC 297.

Read CrPC bare act in a systematic and better way.

Read CrPC section wise.

Download nice, mobile friendly CrPC PDF.

WritingLaw
WritingLaw » CrPC » Section 468 CrPC
Study Material
Law PDFs
Law Tests
Everything
For everyone in law
🟢
53 Bare Act PDFs
Beautiful, colorful PDFs to read anywhere
🟢
110+ complimentary PDFs
100 Law Notes + Legal Maxims, and more...
Pay just once
₹340
Free updates
Read all details Buy all Law PDFs
For those who have read Bare Acts
🟠
23 subject wise tests
These tests have MCQs from one law subject
🟠
10 mixed law tests
These tests have MCQs from multiple subjects
Pay just once
₹1200
Keep test PDFs forever
Read all details Buy all Law Tests
Best Value: ₹215 Discount
🟡
All Law PDFs worth Rs 340
53 Bare Act PDFs + All complimentary PDFs
🟡
All Law Tests worth Rs 1200
33 tests + 33 test PDFs
Pay just once
₹1325
All PDFs for lifetime
Read all details Buy all PDFs and all Tests