384. Summary dismissal of appeal.

(1) If upon examining the petition of appeal and copy of the judgment received under section 382 or section 383, the Appellate Court considers that there is no sufficient ground for interfering, it may dismiss the appeal summarily:
Provided that-
(a) no appeal presented under section 382 shall be dismissed unless the appellant or his pleader has had a reasonable opportunity of being heard in support of the same;
(b) no appeal presented under section 383 shall be dismissed except after giving the appellant a reasonable opportunity of being heard in support of the same, unless the Appellate Court considers that the appeal is frivolous or that the production of the accused in custody before the Court would involve such inconvenience as would be disproportionate in the circumstances of the case;
(c) no appeal presented under section 383 shall be dismissed summarily until the period allowed for preferring such appeal has expired.

(2) Before dismissing an appeal under this section, the Court may call for the record of the case.

(3) Where the Appellate Court dismissing an appeal under this section is a Court of Session or of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, it shall record its reasons for doing so.

(4) Where an appeal presented under section 383 has been dismissed summarily under this section and the Appellate Court finds that another petition of appeal duly presented under section 382 on behalf of the same appellant has not been considered by it, that Court may, notwithstanding anything contained in section 393, if satisfied that it is necessary in the interests of justice so to do, hear and dispose of such appeal in accordance with law.

Comments:
(i) While dismissing appeal summarily High Court should give some brief reasons so that Supreme Court may consider whether it requires further examination;
Degadu v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1981

(ii) Government of State where accused was convicted is the appropriate Government and not Government of the State where the offence was committed;
Hanumat Das v. Vinay Kumar, AIR 1982

(iii) Non-summoning of lower Court record in appeal against conviction is not fatal;
Hanumat Das v. Vinay Kumar, AIR 1982

Read CrPC bare act in a systematic and better way.

Read CrPC section wise.

Download nice, mobile friendly CrPC PDF.

WritingLaw
Latest posts by WritingLaw (see all)
WritingLaw » CrPC » Section 384 CrPC
Study Material
Law PDFs
Law Tests
Everything
For everyone in law
🟢
53 Bare Act PDFs
Beautiful, colorful PDFs to read anywhere
🟢
110+ complimentary PDFs
100 Law Notes + Legal Maxims, and more...
Pay just once
₹340
Free updates
Read all details Buy all Law PDFs
For those who have read Bare Acts
🟠
23 subject wise tests
These tests have MCQs from one law subject
🟠
10 mixed law tests
These tests have MCQs from multiple subjects
Pay just once
₹1200
Keep test PDFs forever
Read all details Buy all Law Tests
Best Value: ₹215 Discount
🟡
All Law PDFs worth Rs 340
53 Bare Act PDFs + All complimentary PDFs
🟡
All Law Tests worth Rs 1200
33 tests + 33 test PDFs
Pay just once
₹1325
All PDFs for lifetime
Read all details Buy all PDFs and all Tests