Difference Between Judicial Custody and Police Custody
Judicial Custody and Police Custody in CrPC

When a person is arrested for any reason, he is taken to custody for questioning and further investigations.

What does an arrest mean? An arrest is nothing but restricting a person’s liberty. Secondly, custody in the general sense is care and protection but here, the meaning of custody changes from care and protection to detention since it is preceded by arrest.

Custody is of two types – Police Custody and Judicial Custody. In this law note, let us learn the meaning of both.

Bare Act PDFs

What Is Police Custody

After the commission of a crime, when the police officer arrests the person involved to prevent further crime and proceed with the investigation, they bring the person to the police station. This is called police custody.

It is the detention of a suspect in the custody of the police in the police lock-up at the police station. The police officer in charge of the case may examine the suspect during this detention, which should not last more than 24 hours.

Within 24 hours, the person arrested is to be produced before the magistrate. In this case, custody refers to police lock-up. According to section 167 of CrPC, a person may be held in police custody for 15 days on the magistrate’s orders.

Related: What if the investigation cannot be completed in 24 hours? You can learn about it here – Section 167 CrPC Explained.

What Is Judicial Custody

Law students and normal people often look for judicial custody meaning. Let me briefly tell you what this is.

In general, judicial custody is the custody of the magistrate. When the accused surrenders before the magistrate, the magistrate will either release the accused on bail or keep him in judicial custody or send him back to police custody.

In the case of judicial custody, custody refers to jail. Jail can be Central Jail or State Jail. Judicial custody may extend to 90 days for serious or grievous crimes with capital punishment such as death, imprisonment for life etc. and 60 days for the rest of the crimes.

Note: If a person is lodged in police custody, the number of days of his stay during lock-up is subtracted from judicial custody.

Case Laws for Police Custody and Judicial Custody

Case Law 1: CBI vs Anupam Kulkarni

Under sub-clause 2 of section 167 CrPC, the magistrate might order the accused to be held in whatever custody he sees fit, but not for more than fifteen days in total. As a result, the initial custody period should not exceed fifteen days. As the magistrate deems fit, the custody can be either police or judicial.

Case Law 2: CBI vs Rathin Dandapath

Even after a charge sheet has been filed, a police remand might be requested in the case of an arrested suspect.

Case Law 3: Alim Patel vs the State of Maharashtra

If the accused is not imprisoned for the entire first 15 days, he can be kept in police custody even after the first 15 days have passed.

Case Law 4: Kosanappu Ramreddy vs the State of AP

If the circumstances warrant, the person can be remanded to judicial custody or police custody within the time period of 15 days set by sub-clause 2 of section 167 CrPC.

Case Law 5: Gian Singh vs the State of Delhi

Interrogation by police while the accused is in judicial custody, is permissible but the magistrate has the authority to direct the location and mode of interrogation. Mere interrogation by police will not alter the nature of custody.

Case Law 6: Mithabhai Patel vs the State of Gujarat

Unless bail is cancelled, the accused cannot be sent to police custody.

Case Law 7: Ahmad Basheer vs SI of Police

If the nature of the offence is changed, police can arrest the accused without having to ask for the order of bail to be revoked.

Case Law 8: The State of UP vs Ram Sagar Yadav

The magistrate should issue a remand based on the right application of mind, not on a mechanical basis.

Case Analysis of P. Chidambaram

Why did P Chidambaram prefer police custody (Enforcement Directorate) over judicial custody?

He preferred police custody over judicial custody because of the following reasons:

  • To avoid the disgrace of being imprisoned with other inmates, where he will be denied access to the luxury and comfort provided in police custody.
  • He wanted to reduce the time to be spent in Tihar Jail.
  • If he were placed in judicial custody, he was at risk of being detained by the ED again, causing the terrible process to repeat itself.

The person’s relative can approach the High Court under Article 226 or Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution. It may be noted that the same has no legal remedy if the accused is under legal custody.

Conclusion

Influential accused persons, politicians etc., enjoy immunity from intensified interrogative tactics. Due to the high-level rise in corruption, police are biased towards resourceful persons, whereas the innocents are getting tortured. Only the judiciary can rescue such innocents by applying the judicial brain and verifying the backgrounds of victims and accused. Only then the innocents can be saved from getting converted to hardened criminals from good samaritans.

ABOUT OUR AUTHOR
Author Amit Das WritingLaw
This article is written by Amit Kumar Das, B.Tech, LLB. He is a practising advocate from Odisha High Court & Puri District Courts.
WritingLaw » Law Notes » What Is Judicial Custody and Police Custody Under CrPC Law Study Material