WritingLaw (Page 268)

85C. Presumption as to Digital Signature Certificates. The Court shall presume, unless contrary is proved, that the information listed in a Electronic Signature Certificate isRead More →

86. Presumption as to certified copies of foreign judicial records. The Court may presume that any document purporting to be a certified copy of anyRead More →

87. Presumption as to Books, Maps and Charts. The Court may presume that any book to which it may refer for information on matters ofRead More →

88. Presumption as to Telegraphic Messages. The Court may presume that a message, forwarded from a telegraph office to the person to whom such messageRead More →

88A. Presumption as to electronic messages. The Court may presume that an electronic message, forwarded by the originator through an electronic mail server to theRead More →

89. Presumption as to due execution etc., of documents not produced. The Court shall presume that every document, called for and not produced after noticeRead More →

90. Presumption as to documents thirty years old. Where any document, purporting or proved to be thirty years old, is produced from any custody whichRead More →

90A. Presumption as to electronic records five years old. Where any electronic record, purporting or proved to be five years old, is produced from anyRead More →

91. Evidence of terms of contracts, grant and other dispositions of property reduced to form of documents. When the terms of a contract, or ofRead More →

92. Exclusion of evidence of oral agreement. When the terms of any such contract, grant or other disposition of property, or any matter required byRead More →

93. Exclusion of evidence to explain or amend ambiguous document. When the language used in a document is, on its face, ambiguous or defective, evidenceRead More →

94. Exclusion of evidence against application of document of existing facts. When language used in a document is plain in itself, and when it appliesRead More →

95. Evidence as to document unmeaning in reference to existing facts. When language used in a document is plain in itself, but is unmeaning inRead More →

96. Evidence as to application of languages which can apply to one only of several persons. When the facts are such that the language usedRead More →

97. Evidence as to application of language to one of two sets of facts to neither of which the whole correctly applies. When the languageRead More →

98. Evidence as to meaning of illegible characters, etc. Evidence may be given to show the meaning of illegible or not commonly intelligible characters, ofRead More →