Privileged Communications under the Indian Evidence Act

Evidence plays an integral part in a trial as it helps in reaching a conclusion and deliver a judgement. Evidence can be oral, documentary or in electronic form. A witness can be testified on any event that he has seen or heard.

Certain communications are protected and cannot be adduced as evidence, and are known as privileged communications. Let us learn more.Read More →

Primary and Secondary Evidence

Section 62 says that primary evidence means the original document itself. The evidence which is not secondary is primary.

Section 61 of Evidence Act says that the content of a document can be proved by two modes – primary evidence or secondary evidence.

It means there is no other prescribed method by law for proving the content of a document.
Read More →

Confession in Police Custody

The main issue of concern is whether a confession given to police officer is admissible or not, and what is the relevancy of confession given to police.

Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act says that a confession made to a police officer is not admissible in the eyes of the law and cannot be proved against the person who made that confession.Read More →

Direct and Circumstantial Evidence in Indian Evidence Act

Direct Evidence
It means any fact which without the intervention of any other fact proves the existence of a fact in issue.

Example,
A is tried for causing grievous hurt to B with a club. C deposes to the fact that he saw the accused, inflicting the blow, which caused the grievous hurt. The evidence adduced (mentioned, pointed out, cite as evidence) by C is direct evidence.Read More →